Investigation and Standardization on Current Practice of Renal Transplant Pathology in Korea.
10.4285/jkstn.2017.31.4.170
- Author:
Uiju CHO
1
;
Kwang Sun SUH
;
Jeong Hae KIE
;
Yeong Jin CHOI
Author Information
1. Department of Pathology, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords:
Kidney;
Transplantation;
Pathology;
Diagnosis;
Standardization
- MeSH:
Allografts;
Biopsy;
Classification;
Consensus;
Diagnosis;
Education;
Humans;
Kidney;
Korea*;
Pathology*;
Surveys and Questionnaires;
Transplantation
- From:The Journal of the Korean Society for Transplantation
2017;31(4):170-176
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
We need to establish an informative guideline to increase inter-institutional and inter-observer reproducibility of renal transplant diagnosis, and to improve the diagnostic ability of pathologists in Korea. A first nation-wide survey for renal transplant pathology was conducted by Renal Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists in 2016, to provide the continued excellence in the transplantation pathology laboratory, and to improve the diagnostic ability for the best treatment of transplant patients. This survey revealed the significant variations in scale, work load and biopsy indications for the renal transplant pathology in various institutions in Korea. The Banff classification were used by all institutions for the diagnosis of renal transplant pathology, but different formats were used: most institutions (70%) used the “2013 Banff classification” while the others were using “2007 Banff classification” (20%) or even older formats. In daily diagnostic practice of the renal allografts, difficulties that pathologists encounter were quite diverse due to different environments they work in. Most respondents agreed that standardized diagnostic practice guidelines, regular education on renal transplant pathology and convenient ways of consultation are further needed. We are currently working toward the enhancement of the expertise of renal pathologists and to increase inter-institutional and inter-observer reproducibility by 1) development of a set of virtual slides of renal allograft biopsies for the training, 2) validation and gathering expert's consensus on the core variables of rejection diagnosis by using virtual slides, and 3) continued education by the developed virtual slide atlas.
