Comparative Evaluation of Abdominal, Transvaginal and Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension for Genuine Stress Incontinence.
- Author:
Seung Ok YANG
1
;
Young Kyung PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Chonju, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Burch colposuspension;
Stress urinary incontinence
- MeSH:
Catheters;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Laparoscopy;
Length of Stay;
Operative Time;
Physical Examination;
Retrospective Studies;
Ultrasonography;
Urinary Bladder;
Urinary Incontinence;
Urodynamics
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
1999;40(9):1195-1199
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Burch colposuspension has been used for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with effectiveness. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the efficacy among abdominal, transvaginal and laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. We also compared the clinical course and complications after each procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty seven patients underwent Burch colposuspension were evaluated according to their approach methods. All patients were assessed for detailed history, physical examination, urodynamic study, transperineal ultrasonography, operative time, catheter indwelling period, hospital stays, success rate, and complications. RESULTS: The success rates of abdominal, transvaginal and laparoscopic Burch were 90, 86 and 76% respectively, at 26 months follow up. There was no significant complication except for a case of bladder injury in the laparoscopy group. Laparoscopic Burch operation had advantages of less invasive approach, less morbidity, shorter hospital stays and provided successful outcomes in patients with stress urinary incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: With these results, we could conclude that open, transvaginal or laparoscopic Burch operations were effective and safe for SUI with no significant differences of efficacy according to approach methods.
