Association between Type D Personality and the Somatic Symptom Complaints in Depressive Patients.
- Author:
Wu Ri PARK
;
Seong Hoon JEONG
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Type D personality;
Physical complaint;
Depressive disorder
- MeSH:
Affective Symptoms;
Depression;
Depressive Disorder;
Heart Diseases;
Humans;
Linear Models
- From:Korean Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine
2013;21(1):18-26
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: Type D personality was originally introduced to study the role of personality in predicting outcomes of heart disease. However, researches showed that other medical conditions are also affected by this personality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between type D personality and somatic symptom complaints in depressive patients. METHODS: Eighty-two individuals diagnosed with depressive disorder were included. Type D personality was measured with DS14. Patient Health Questionnaire(PHQ) 9 and 15 were used to measure depression severity and somatization tendencies. For alexithymia, TAS-20 was used. Student T-test and linear regression analysis were performed. The best regression model was determined by stepwise variable selection. RESULTS: More than half of the subjects(56%) complained at least medium degree somatic symptoms according to PHQ-15 criteria. Two-thirds of the subjects were classified as Type D personality(63.4%). The mean PHQ-15 score of the Type D individuals was significantly higher than the remaining subjects(PHQ-15 mean=12.7, p=8.2x10-7). The best regression model included age, PHQ-9 score and NA subscale score as predictor variables. Among these, only the coefficients of age(p=1.5x10(-3)) and NA score(p=1.5x10(-7)) were found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The result showed that Type D personality was one of the strong predictors of somatic complaints among depressive individuals. The finding that negative affectivity rather than social inhibition was more closely associated with somatization tendencies does not fully agree with the traditional explanation that inability to express negative emotion predispose the individuals to somatic symptoms. The finding that alexithymia was not shown to be a significant predictors also substantiated this discrepancy. However, it might be possible that the high correlation between NA and SI subscore(r=0.65) and between NA and TAS-20 score(r=0.44) hid the additional effects of social inhibition and alexithymia. Further research with a larger sample would be needed to investigate the effects of the latter two components over and above the effect of negative affectivity on the somatic complaints in depressive patients.
