Perioperative Evaluation of Respiratory Muscle Strength after Scoliosis Correction in Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.
10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.787
- Author:
Wataru SAITO
1
;
Kosuke MIZUNO
;
Gen INOUE
;
Takayuki IMURA
;
Toshiyuki NAKAZAWA
;
Masayuki MIYAGI
;
Eiki SHIRASAWA
;
Kentaro UCHIDA
;
Masashi TAKASO
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan. boatwataru0712@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Respiratory muscle;
Duchenne muscular dystrophy;
Pulmonary function;
Scoliosis correction
- MeSH:
Cohort Studies;
Fatigue;
Humans;
Male;
Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne*;
Respiratory Muscles*;
Retrospective Studies;
Scoliosis*;
Spirometry;
Vital Capacity
- From:Asian Spine Journal
2017;11(5):787-792
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of spinal correction on respiratory muscle strength in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Several studies have reported that scoliosis correction in patients with DMD does not improve pulmonary function. In these studies, pulmonary function was evaluated using the traditional spirometric values of percent vital capacity (%VC) and percent forced vital capacity (%FVC). However, traditional spirometry may not be suitable for patients with DMD because the results can be influenced by patient fatigue or level of understanding. Therefore, we evaluated respiratory function focusing on respiratory muscle strength using maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP), in addition to %VC and %FVC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 16 patients with DMD who underwent spinal correction surgery between 2006 and 2011 at Kitasato University Hospital. All patients were males, and the mean age was 13.5 years. Respiratory muscle strength was evaluated using MIP, MEP, and SNIP. Measurements were obtained preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively, and %VC and %FVC were obtained preoperatively and within 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean preoperative and postoperative %VC values were 54.0% and 51.7%, whereas the mean %FVC values were 53.9% and 53.2%, respectively. The mean MIP, MEP, and SNIP values obtained preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively were as follows: MIP, 40.5, 42.7 and 47.2 cm H₂O; MEP, 26.0, 28.0, and 29.0 cm H₂O; and SNIP, 33.4, 33.0, and 33.0 cm H₂O; respectively. The mean MIP and MEP values significantly improved postoperatively. There were no significant differences in SNIP, %VC, or %FVC preand postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: By focusing on respiratory muscle strength, our results suggest that scoliosis correction in patients with DMD might have a favorable effect on respiratory function.
