Analysis of AVS- penogram in 3000 Impotent Patients.
- Author:
Young Guy MINN
1
;
Hyung Ki CHOI
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
AVS-penogram;
Impotence
- MeSH:
Diagnosis;
Diagnosis, Differential;
Erectile Dysfunction;
Female;
Humans;
Impotence, Vasculogenic;
Male;
Mass Screening;
Penile Erection;
Photic Stimulation
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
1994;35(9):1001-1006
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Audio visual stimulation penogram(AVS-penogram) is used as a screening method for evaluation of erectile dysfunction. In this study, 3000 patients were evaluated from Dec. 1986 to Dec. 1992 and finally diagnosed by comprehensive diagnostic methods. The patients were classified according to AVS-penogram curves into 4 types and correlated with the patient's final diagnosis. For 800 patients who were evaluated with combined AVS penogram and NPT monitoring, compatibility ratios between psychogenic and organic group were compared. After correlating each of the curve type with the patients and comparing erotic and nocturnal erection, following results were obtained. 1. The mean age of the patients was 41.25 years. 2. The overall rate of final diagnosis were 57.5%, 14.3%, 8.9% in psychogenic, arteriogenic and venogenic impotence 3. Type I group was proved as psychogenic impotence in 87% of the patients. 4. Type II A group was proved as organic impotence in 79% of the patients and most of them had neurogenic and arteriogenic impotence. 5. Type II B group was proved as psychogenic impotence in 51%, organic impotence in 49% of the patients. Among the organic impotence group, most of them had arteriogenic, venogenic and neurogenic impotence. The difference of both group was statistically insignificant. 6. Type II C group was proved as psychogenic impotence in 39%, organic impotence in 61% of the patients. Further studies are needed for subclassification of both groups. 7. The compatibility ratio of the AVS-penogram and NPTM was 85.9% in psychogenic group with normal finding in both tests and 44.7% in organic group with abnormal finding in both tests. In conclusion, AVS-penogram is a primary diagnostic method in screening impotent patients and type I is regarded as psychogenic impotence. In Type IIB and IIC, subclassification of curve type is needed for differential diagnosis between psychogenic and organic impotence. Further studies are needed in more cases to obtain the objective analysis with compatibility ratio in combined AVS-penogram and nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring.
