The Value of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in Patients Who will be Performed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
10.7602/jmis.2012.15.3.68
- Author:
Jin O BAEK
1
;
Yong Hoon KIM
;
Keun Soo AHN
;
Tae Jun PARK
;
Koo Jeong KANG
;
Tae Jin LIM
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea. hbps@dsmc.or.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Gallbladder;
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy;
Bile ducts;
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
- MeSH:
Bile Ducts;
Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance;
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic;
Common Bile Duct;
Gallbladder;
Hospital Costs;
Humans;
Length of Stay;
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy;
Magnetics;
Magnets;
Postoperative Complications
- From:Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
2012;15(3):68-74
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the value of preoperative MRCP prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy by analysis of postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Between 2009.12~2010.12, 283 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of benign biliary disease. Among these patients, 125 underwent preoperative MRCP and were classified as the MRCP group. The remaining 158 patients who did not undergo MRCP were classified as the non MRCP group. We compared perioperative data, including the rate of bile duct injury, operative complication, conversion rate, hospital stay, and hospital cost between the two groups. In addition, we analyzed preoperative MRCP findings, including common bile duct (CBD) stones and bile duct anomaly. RESULTS: Findings on pre-operative MRCP scan revealed silent CBD stones in five patients (4.0%) and bile duct anomalies were identified in 17 patients (13.6%). Three cases of bile duct injury occurred in the non MRCP group, whereas, no bile duct injury occurred in the MRCP group. No significant statistical difference in postoperative complication was observed in either group. Mean duration of operation was 50.5 (+/-30.4) minutes in the MRCP group, and 52.2 (+/-29.9) minutes in the non MRCP group (p=0.630). Post operative hospital stay was 2.1 (+/-1.4) days (mean) in the MRCP group, and 2.5 (+/-2.5) days in the non MRCP group. No statistical difference was observed between the two groups (p=0.110). CONCLUSION: MRCP may be useful for evaluation of bile duct anomaly and identification of hidden bile duct stones. However, this modality did not show statistical benefits for postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
