Evaluation of ACCU-CHEK(R) Inform II Blood Glucose Meter and ACCU-CHEK(R) Performa Strip.
- Author:
Youkyung SEO
1
;
Youngcheol WON
;
Hyo Sik KIM
;
Oh Hun KWON
;
Woonhyoung LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. lukerubi@yuhs.ac
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Glucometer;
Maltose interference;
Glucose dehydrogenase-pyrroloquinoline quinine
- MeSH:
Blood Glucose;
Chemistry, Clinical;
Glucose;
Humans;
Insulin;
Maltose;
Quality Control
- From:Journal of Laboratory Medicine and Quality Assurance
2012;34(1):9-12
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels is recommended for all diabetic patients who receive insulin treatment, because such monitoring of glucose levels may aid in achieving better control in type II diabetes. Further, the use of point-of-care (POC) blood glucose testing in hospitals has increased substantially. In the present study, we validated the performance of ACCU-CHEK(R) Inform II Blood Glucose Meter and ACCU-CHEK(R) Performa Strip (Roche Diagnostics, Germany). METHODS: We evaluated the precision, accuracy, and maltose interference of the ACCU-CHEK(R) Inform II Blood Glucose Meter and ACCU-CHEK(R) Performa Strip. Further, precision was evaluated using dedicated quality control (QC) and Bio-Rad Whole Blood (WB) QC materials (Meter Trax(TM) Control; Bio-Rad, USA). Forty samples were used to compare the results obtained using the ACCU-CHEK(R) Inform II Blood Glucose Meter and ACCU-CHEK(R) Performa Strip with those obtained using the clinical chemistry analyzer Hitachi 7600 (Hitachi, Japan). Maltose interference was assessed at 2 glucose concentration levels at 3 maltose concentration levels. RESULTS: For each concentration level of control materials, within-run coefficient of variation (CV) and total CV obtained were less than 5%. Good correlation was obtained using the Hitachi 7600 (y = 1.02x - 0.18; r 2 = 0.996; N = 40). Effects of maltose interference were less than 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the ACCU-CHEK(R) systems show good precision and correlation with the routine clinical chemistry analyzer and allow only minimal effects of maltose interference.
