Long-term Clinical Follow-up in Patients with Left Main Coronary Disease According to Treatment Strategies.
10.4070/kcj.2003.33.7.568
- Author:
Jae Hyeong PARK
;
Yoon Haeng CHO
;
Seung Whan LEE
;
Young Hak KIM
;
Cheol Whan LEE
;
Myeong Ki HONG
;
Jae Joong KIM
;
Seong Wook PARK
;
Seung Jung PARK
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Bypass surgery;
Angioplasty
- MeSH:
Angioplasty;
Coronary Artery Bypass;
Coronary Artery Disease;
Coronary Disease*;
Follow-Up Studies*;
Humans;
Incidence;
Mortality;
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention;
Survival Rate;
Transplants
- From:Korean Circulation Journal
2003;33(7):568-573
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many studies have shown that coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery prolongs the life of patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCD). Recently, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been applied to treat LMCD, with good clinical results. However, a significant portion of patients decline any revascularization therapy, so receive medical treatment only. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long term clinical outcome in these patients with LMCD, according to the treatment strategies. SUBJECTS AND MEHTODS: The clinical outcomes of 281 consecutive patients, with significant LMCD, between January 1997 and December 2000, were evaluated. The patients were divided into three groups, according to their initial treatment strategies;1) CABG, 2) PCI and 3) medical treatment. The mean follow-up duration was 37.4+/-14.9 months. RESULTS: The 1- and 3-year survival rates in the CABG group (97.4+/-1.5% and 95.6+/-1.9%) were significantly higher than those of the medical group (89.8+/-3.9% and 76.1+/-5.9%;p=0.03). The survival rates in the PCI group (one year and 3-year survival rate, 98.1+/-1.3% and 93.8+/-2.5%) were similar to those of the CABG group (p=0.93). The incidence of 3-year MACE in the medical group (40.7%) was higher than those of the CABG (10.5%, p<0.001) and PCI groups (20.4%, p=0.007). There was no significant difference between the CABG and PCI groups (p=0.06). CONCLUSION: In patients with LMCD, a CABG remains the standard therapy for prolonging survival and lowering the incidence of MACE. PCI offers similar survival benefits in selected patients. Medical treatment is associated with a significantly higher mortality and MACE. Active revascularization therapy should be the treatment of choice for the patients with LMCD.
