Two Cultures in Medicine: Reduction or Construction?.
- Author:
Shin Ik KANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Medical History and the Humanities, School of Medicine, Inje University, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article ; English Abstract ; Historical Article
- Keywords:
Two Cultures;
Reductionism;
Determinism;
Social Constructionism
- MeSH:
*Cultural Diversity;
English Abstract;
History of Medicine, 20th Cent.;
History of Medicine, 21st Cent.;
Humanities/*history;
Philosophy, Medical/*history;
Science/*history
- From:Korean Journal of Medical History
2002;11(1):1-19
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Medicine is not only a science but also belongs to the humanities. Being a science means that it has the objective and universally applicable methodology. Science, because of its stringent methodologies (determinism, reductionism and mechanism), cannot grasp the fruitful context of human life. Although the humanities can give us flexible wisdom of life, nobody can insist on its objective and universal applicability. We have two different cultures in medicine - those of science and the humanities. If you examine the ways how people choose health services, however, you can find that they do not have any conflict between the two cultures. They simply do not care whether the service they are going to buy is orthodox or alternative if they have high expectations of it. The two cultures already have been resolved in their lives. I suggest that we should learn from ordinary people and not from logics of science and philosophy to resolve the conflict between the two cultures. We can probably begin with the fact that the ultimate goal of medicine is to serve the people and not to find abstract truth in the material body.
