Comparison Between HLA-DR Serological Typing and O1igotyping.
- Author:
Jai Ho WEE
;
Ki Cheol JEONG
;
Tai Gyeom KIM
;
Jin Yeong HAN
;
Jeong Man KIM
- Publication Type:Original Article
- MeSH:
Digoxigenin;
DNA;
DNA Fingerprinting;
Education;
Histocompatibility;
HLA-DR Antigens*;
Immune Sera;
Kidney Transplantation;
Oligonucleotides;
Transplants
- From:Korean Journal of Clinical Pathology
1997;17(6):1089-1099
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: In renal transplantation, a good HLA-DR match Is associated with successive graft outcome. But due to a number of technical problems, reliable serological DR typing cannot always be obtained. To compare the serological DR typing with DRBI DNA typing, we tested 103 specimens that had been frozen after serological typing, by PCR-SSOP typing method. METHODS: Serological DR typing was performed by complement-dependent microlymphocytotoxicity technique using commercial antisera kits, and DNA gyp ins was performed by PCR-SSOP, using one of the methods recommended by 12th International Histocompatibility Workshop. DNA amplification was done by DRBAMP-A and DRBAMP-B primers, and hybridization by 18 oligonucleotides labelled with digoxigenin.. RESULTS: The concordance rate between serologic typing and DNA typing was 76.7%. Most (79.0%) of discordant results were due to serological blanks turning out to be definable antigens by DNA typing and these antigens consisted of mainly DR5 splits but none of DR1, DR2, or DR7. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of technical improvement, serological typing method often can not define the accurate HLA-DR type. It is thought that combining serological typing with DNA typing Is necessary to achieve a higher success rate of graft outcome.
