The Effect Of Surface Treatments On The Rebonded Resin-Bonded Retainers.
- Author:
Sang Pil KIM
1
;
Dong Wan KANG
Author Information
1. Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Korea. dwkang@ chosun.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Resin-bonded prothesis;
Surface treatment;
Sandblasting;
Metal primer
- MeSH:
Adhesives;
Alloys;
Aluminum Oxide;
Dentists;
Denture, Partial;
Denture, Partial, Fixed;
Denture, Partial, Fixed, Resin-Bonded;
Humans;
Prostheses and Implants;
Silicones;
Tooth;
Water
- From:The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2002;40(6):590-596
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
The resin : metal interface is at the basis of most bonding failures in resin-bonded prosthesis. Although debonding has been a problem with adhesive fixed partial dentures, various dentists classify them as long-term restorations. The advantages of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures include minimal tooth reduction and the possibility of rebonding . if resin-bonded protheses can be easily rebounded, it is of clinical importance to know if the lutingagents rebond as well the second time as they did originally. Several retentive systems for resin-to-metal bonding have recommended. Treatments such as electrolytic etching and silicone coating, despite the good result of bond strength, have proved to be time-consuming and technique-sensitive. Therefore a simple and more reliable method is desirable. This study evaluated the effect of metal surface treatments on the rebond strength of panavia 21cement to a nickel-chromium(Ni-Cr) alloy. The samples were received the following surface treatments : Group No.1(control or served as the control) treatment with sandblasting with 50um aluminum oxide and ultrasonically cleaned for 10minutes in double-deionized water, Group No.2 were no surface treatments. Group No.3 were treated with metal primer. Group No.4 were treated with sandblasting as previously described, and then metal priming. From the analysis of the results, the following conclusions were drawn: 1. Sandblasting and metal priming appears to be an effective method for treatment of metal after accidental debonding. 2. Group without surface treatment had significantly lower bond strengths compared with other groups. 3. The combination of sandblasting and metal priming may not develop superior bonding strengths compared with other techniques that used the Ni-Cr alloys. 4. Combination of cohesive and adhesive failures were the most common type observed. The results support the use of sandblasting as a viable procedure when rebonding accidentally lost adhesive partial denture. We concluded that sandblsting and metal priming of metal surface before bonding could provide the adequate bond strength during rebonding of resin-bonded fixed partial denture.
