Clinical Effect of The Lumbar Facet Joint Arthrography and Injection for Facet Joint Syndrome.
10.4184/jkss.2011.18.2.51
- Author:
Dea Ho HA
1
;
Tae Kyun KIM
;
Dae Moo SHIM
;
Young YI
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Korea. osktg@wonkwang.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Facet Joint Syndrome;
Facet Joint Block
- MeSH:
Anesthetics, Local;
Arthrography;
Back Pain;
Epidural Space;
Humans;
Injections, Intra-Articular;
Joints;
Low Back Pain;
Orthopedics;
Palliative Care;
Placebo Effect;
Surveys and Questionnaires;
Spondylolysis;
Synovial Cyst;
Zygapophyseal Joint
- From:Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2011;18(2):51-56
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
STUDY DESIGN: Intra-articular injections of long acting steriod and local anesthetics after lumbar facet joint(LFJ) arthrography are routinely used for therapeutic purposes in selected patients for relief of chronic low back pain. However, because of the difficulty in finding an accurate position of the symptomatic joint, the possibility of complication and the placebo effect, there are doubts about the clinical application of this treatment. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess the diagnostic value and clinical benefits of lumbar facet joint arthrogram & injection of long acting steriod and local anesthetics in patients with facet joint syndrome. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: The radiological relationship and the diagnostic elements of facet joint syndrome need to be analyzed and evaluated for increasing the effectiveness of lumbar injection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty two patients with low back pain were enrolled in the trial and they met the following criteria: pain for more than 3 months, no root signs and no history of back surgery. The response to facet joint injection was analyzed according to the chief complaints, a provocative test, the Visual Analogue Scale(VAS), the Helbig & Lee(HL) score, the facet block procedure and the arthrogram findings. A questionnaire with a pain scale was administered immediately or the day after injection, and then after 1, 3, 6 and 12 weeks. The arthrograms were reviewed by a radiologist & orthopedic specialist. RESULTS: One hundred sixty nine joint injections were performed in 52 patients (L 3-4, n=33; L4-5, n=64; L5-S1, n=72). Thirty one patients had a chief complain of back pain that was aggravated by extension/rotation of the trunk and the provocative test was positive in 73.1%. The rates of a good response in the study group were 69.2% after one day, 44.2% after 3 weeks and 36.5% after 12 months. Arthrograms revealed synovial cysts in 1 of these patients and 5 patients had abnormal communication with spondylolysis. Two patients had contrast extravasated into the epidural space during injection. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar arthrography showed a low diagnostic value. Lumbar injections, as a useful procedure to diagnosis facet joint syndrome, could be a useful palliative treatment modality for treating chronic lower back pain. But strict diagnostic criteria through a scoring system is needed to achieve a higher degree of predictability and effectiveness of facet joint injection.
