Inter- and Intra-observer Variability of a Cervical OPLL Classification Using Reconstructed CT Images.
- Author:
Han CHANG
1
;
Chae Gwan KONG
;
Ho Yeon WON
;
Ju Hwan KIM
;
Jong Beom PARK
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; Classification; Reliability; Computed tomography
- MeSH: Adult; Aged; Cervical Vertebrae/radiography; Female; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Male; Middle Aged; Observer Variation; Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament/*classification/*radiography; *Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- From:Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2010;2(1):8-12
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND: The lateral radiograph-based system described by Tsuyama is used widely to classify ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) of the cervical spine. However, OPLL is a complex 3-dimensional (3-D) lesion, not a simple and uniplanar one, which is often difficult to identify on a lateral radiograph. Furthermore, its reliability among spine surgeons has not been investigated. Given the popularity of a reconstructed computed tomography (CT), this study examined the inter- and intra-observer reliability of lateral radiograph-based OPLL classification using that modality. METHODS: Five spine surgeons independently reviewed the lateral radiograph, axial CT, 2-D (sagittal) and 3-D reconstructed CT images of 108 OPLL patients on 2 separate occasions. Based on these images, the reviewers classified each OPLL case according to the Tsuyama's system. The kappa values were used to assess the statistical reliability. RESULTS: The inter- and intra-observer kappa values were only 0.51 and 0.67 for the lateral radiograph, even in combination with the axial CT images, 0.70 and 0.85 for 2-D CT images, and 0.76 and 0.86 for 3-D CT images, respectively. These kappa values showed a good-to-excellent range for the 2-D and 3-D reconstructed CT images while those of the lateral radiograph indicated a fair range. According to the OPLL types, the inter- and intra-observer reliability was low in the continuous type and high in the circumscribed type on the lateral radiograph. However, the low reliability of the continuous type on lateral radiograph was overcome somewhat using 2-D and 3-D reconstructed CT images. CONCLUSIONS: The inter- and intra-observer kappa values were only 0.51 and 0.67 for the lateral radiograph, even in combination with the axial CT images, 0.70 and 0.85 for 2-D CT images, and 0.76 and 0.86 for 3-D CT images, respectively. These kappa values showed a good-to-excellent range for the 2-D and 3-D reconstructed CT images while those of the lateral radiograph indicated a fair range. According to the OPLL types, the inter- and intra-observer reliability was low in the continuous type and high in the circumscribed type on the lateral radiograph. However, the low reliability of the continuous type on lateral radiograph was overcome somewhat using 2-D and 3-D reconstructed CT images.
