Orbital Wall Restoring Surgery in Pure Blowout Fractures.
10.5999/aps.2014.41.6.686
- Author:
Nam Kyu LIM
1
;
Dong Hee KANG
;
Sang Ah OH
;
Ja Hea GU
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea. dhkcool@dankook.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Orbital fractures;
Enophthalmos;
Paranasal sinuses
- MeSH:
Enophthalmos;
Humans;
Orbit*;
Orbital Fractures;
Paranasal Sinuses;
Retrospective Studies;
Weights and Measures
- From:Archives of Plastic Surgery
2014;41(6):686-692
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Restoring orbital volume in large blowout fractures is still a technically challenge to the orbital surgeon. In this study, we restored the orbital wall using the combination of transorbital and transnasal approach with additional supports from the paranasal sinuses, and we compared the surgical outcome to that of a conventional transorbital method. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with pure unilateral blowout fractures between March 2007 and March 2013 was conducted. 150 patients were classified into two groups according to the surgical method: conventional transorbital method (group A, 75 patients, control group), and the combination of transorbital and transnasal approach with additional supports from the paranasal sinuses (group B, 75 patients, experimental group). Each group was subdivided depending on fracture location: group I (inferior wall), group IM (inferomedial wall), and group M (medial wall). The surgical results were assessed by the Hertel scale and a comparison of preoperative and postoperative orbital volume ratio (OVR) values. RESULTS: In the volumetric analysis, the OVR decreased more by the experimental groups than each corresponding control groups (P<0.05). Upon ophthalmic examination, neither the differences among the groups in the perioperative Hertel scale nor the preoperative and postoperative Hertel scales were statistically significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our surgical results suggest that orbital volume was more effectively restored by the combination of transorbital and transnasal approach with additional supports from the paranasal sinuses than the conventional method, regardless of the type of fracture.
