The Need for an Implant Identification Card at Airport Security Check.
10.4055/cios.2017.9.2.153
- Author:
Erden ALI
1
;
Dennis KOSUGE
;
Andrew MACDOWELL
Author Information
1. Magdalene College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. erden@doctors.org.uk
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Joint;
Hip arthroplasty;
Knee arthroplasty;
Security measures;
Travel and aviation
- MeSH:
Airports*;
Arthroplasty;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee;
Aviation;
Delivery of Health Care;
Female;
Humans;
Joints;
Lower Extremity;
Male;
Patient Selection;
Security Measures
- From:Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
2017;9(2):153-159
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Joint replacement surgery is having an increasing demand as national healthcare systems confront an ever ageing population. Surgical complications associated with lower limb arthroplasty are well known but less investigation has been performed examining its effect on air travel, more specifically, unwanted and significant inconvenience caused to travelers going through airport security. METHODS: In lower limb arthroplasty clinics, 50 patients who met our selection criteria were given questionnaires. Ten airport security officers from 4 international airports (London Stansted, London Gatwick, London Heathrow, and Amsterdam Schiphol International Airport) were also given a separate questionnaire. The opinion of the Civil Aviation Authority was also sought. RESULTS: All 50 patients (mean age, 70.4 years; range, 55 to 84 years) who were presenting in lower limb arthroplasty clinics and who met our selection criteria volunteered to enter the study. Twenty-eight of these patients were female (mean age, 69.1 years; range, 55 to 84 years) and 22 were male (mean age, 71.2 years; range, 58 to 81 years). Of the patients, 14% stated that their joint replacements did not set off the airport security alarm. Responses were received from 10 airport security officers as well. Six airport security officers were male and 4 were female. All of the airport officers were aware of some form of implant identification card with 90% stating that these were useful to them at airport security. Eight-four percent of the patients stated that an implant identification card outlining what joint replacement they possessed and when this had been done would be very useful. Sixteen percent of the patients did not think a card would be beneficial since all of them had set off the airport alarm system only once or less in their lifetime. CONCLUSIONS: It is the opinion of airport security officers and patients that joint replacement implant identification cards streamline airport security checks and decrease the need for more invasive searches at airport security.
