Cytotoxicity of newly developed pozzolan cement and other root-end filling materials on human periodontal ligament cell.
- Author:
Minju SONG
1
;
Tae Sun YOON
;
Sue Youn KIM
;
Euiseong KIM
Author Information
- Publication Type:In Vitro ; Original Article
- Keywords: Cytotoxicity; Endocem; Pozzolan cement; Root-end filling material; WST-1 assay
- MeSH: Cell Count; Cell Survival; Humans*; Incubators; Methods; Periodontal Ligament*; Pemetrexed
- From:Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2014;39(1):39-44
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate in vitro cytotoxicity of the pozzolan cement and other root-end filling materials using human periodontal ligament cell. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endocem (Maruchi), white ProRoot MTA (Dentsply), white Angelus MTA (Angelus), and Super EBA (Bosworth Co.) were tested after set completely in an incubator at 37degrees C for 7 days, Endocem was tested in two ways: 1) immediately after mixing (fresh specimens) and 2) after setting completely like other experimental materials. The methods for assessment included light microscopic examination, cell counting and WST-1 assay on human periodontal ligament cell. RESULTS: In the results of microscopic examination and cell counting, Super EBA showed significantly lower viable cell than any other groups (p < 0.05). As the results of WST-1 assay, compared with untreated control group, there was no significant cell viability of the Endocem group. However, the fresh mixed Endocem group had significantly less cell viability. The cells exposed to ProRoot MTA and Angelus MTA showed the highest viability, whereas the cells exposed to Super EBA displayed the lowest viability (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The cytotoxicity of the pozzolan cement (Endocem) was comparable with ProRoot MTA and Angelus MTA. Considering the difficult manipulation and long setting time of ProRoot MTA and Angelus MTA, Endocem can be used as the alternative of retrofilling material.
