Comparative study on medical fees: caesarean section, cataract, and appendectomy surgeries among OECD countries.
10.5124/jkma.2013.56.6.523
- Author:
Changwoo LEE
1
;
Hae Jong LEE
;
So Jung PARK
Author Information
1. Korea Insurance Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Comparative Study ; Original Article
- Keywords:
Medical fees;
International comparison
- MeSH:
Appendectomy;
Appointments and Schedules;
Cataract;
Cesarean Section;
Employment;
Fee Schedules;
Fees and Charges;
Fees, Medical;
Female;
Information Services;
Insurance, Health;
Korea;
National Health Programs;
Negotiating;
Pregnancy
- From:Journal of the Korean Medical Association
2013;56(6):523-532
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The question has been raised whether the medical fee schedule is very low in Korea. However, studies that empirically address this matter on a national scale are rare. This study attempted to determine the level of Korea's medical fees for caesarean section (C-section), cataract, and appendectomy surgeries by comparing and analyzing them with other Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries' medical cost data obtained from other studies. There are two ways to compare the level of medical fees: one is a direct comparison, which obtains each country's medical fee schedule and compares them with each other. Another is indirect comparison, a method which compares data such as physician income. For direct comparison, fees were calculated using data provided by the OECD and Health Insurance Review and Assessment. For indirect comparison by physician income, data obtained from Korea Employment Information Services were used to represent Korean physician income. When compared with other OECD countries, the results suggest that, overall, the Korean fee schedule could be low, based on the fees for C-section, cataract, and appendectomy surgeries. The study results also confirm that Korean physicians' average earnings ranked relatively low among OECD countries. These results are meaningful in that they empirically support the contention that Korean medical fees could be low. In addition, under what is known as national health insurance, in which the medical fee schedule is determined by a single payer, an empirical analysis on medical fee levels, as in this study, has substantial political implications because it may be utilized for medical fee schedule negotiation in the near future. An attempt to directly research fees and the range of services of OECD countries is still needed in order to provide more established data.
