Agreement of Findings in Transrectal Ultrasonography with Those in Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosis of Diseases in the Seminal Tract.
- Author:
Yun Seob SONG
1
;
Moo Sang LEE
;
Myeong Jin KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
transrectal ultrasonography
- MeSH:
Atrophy;
Calculi;
Diagnosis*;
Dilatation;
Ejaculatory Ducts;
Hemorrhage;
Humans;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging*;
Male;
Seminal Vesicles;
Ultrasonography*;
Vas Deferens
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
1996;37(4):401-406
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Transrectal Ultrasonography (TRUS) easily provides an accurate assessment of the seminal tract. In Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI) of the seminal tract, the anatomic relationships are more clearly seen and the multiplanar imaging is available, so a more definitive diagnosis can be achieved. Although TRUS and MRI have been studied extensively, the findings of TRUS have not been compared with those of MRI. We studied 29 patients who were assessed with TRUS and MRI simultaneously due to disease of the seminal tract. The findings of cystic disease were coincident between TRUS and MRI. But the small size Mullerian duct cysts were not found in TRUS but were found in MRI. Hemorrhage of the ejaculatory duct and seminal vesicle, thickened ampulla portion of vas deferens were found only in MRI. Ejaculatory duct and seminal vesicle calcification were not easily found in TRUS due to their small size. The findings of seminal vesicle atrophy, dilatation and prostatic calcification between TRUS and MRI were discrepant. In conclusion, MRI is more helpful than TRUS in the diagnosis of small Mullerian duct cyst, small ejaculatory duct calculi, small seminal vesicle calculi, hemorrhage of ejaculatory duct and seminal vesicle and thickened ampulla portion of vas eferens.
