Functional Severity of Coronary Stenosis in Relation to Luminologic Severity in AMI: Comparison with Angina.
- Author:
Eui Soo HONG
1
;
Jeong Kee SEO
;
Ki Hoon LEE
;
Dae Hyeok KIM
;
Hyo Jung LEE
;
Hoon Gi PARK
;
Jun KWAN
;
Keum Soo PARK
;
Woo Hyung LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Myocardial infarction; Angina pectoris; Pressure; Ultrasonography
- MeSH: Angina Pectoris; Constriction, Pathologic; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis*; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Phenobarbital; Ultrasonography
- From:Korean Circulation Journal 2002;32(1):38-46
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
- Abstract: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Positive correlations between quantitative coronary angiography and functional indexes of coronary stenosis are well known in angina pectoris. However, there is little data concerning correlations with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The objective of this study was to evaluate the differences in correlation of functional severity and luminologic severity between patients with angina and acute myocardial infarction. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 23 patients with AMI and 25 patients with angina pectoris. We performed intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and intracoronary pressure measurement following diagnostic coronary angiography, and measured angiographic diameter stenosis (DST), minimal luminal diameter (MLD), minimal luminal area (MLA), and reference area stenosis (r-AST). Additionally, the fractional flow reserve (FFR) was defined by the ratio of the distal mean coronary pressure (Pd) to the aortic mean pressure (Pa). RESULTS: The IVUS parameters and DST in patients with AMI showed more severe stenosis than seen in patients with angina; MLD (1.37+/-0.30 mm vs 1.73+/-0.63 mm, p<0.05), MLA (1.99+/-0.80 mm 2 vs 3.20+/-2.25 mm 2, p<0.05), r-AST (79+/-9% vs 64+/-24%, p<0.05), DST (78+/-14% vs 68+/-21%, p<0.05) respectively. FFR showed no significant difference between the patients with AMI and angina (0.733+/-0.14 vs 0.729+/-0.14, p>0.05). FFR was correlated less with r-AST in patients with myocardial infarction than angina ( - 0.55 vs - 0.84). The r-AST in patients with AMI, in order to be the best cut-off values that fit with a FFR<0.75, was higher than seen in patients with angina (83% vs 67%). CONCLUSION: FFR in AMI was not significantly different from that seen in angina despite the presence of a significant difference of IVUS parameters between the two patient groups. The functional severity of stenosis in relation to its luminologic severity may be lessened following acute myocardial infarction.
