Three-dimensional assessment of the temporomandibular joint and mandibular dimensions after early correction of the maxillary arch form in patients with Class II division 1 or division 2 malocclusion.
10.4041/kjod.2015.45.3.121
- Author:
Hande Gorucu COSKUNER
1
;
Semra CIGER
Author Information
1. Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. hande.gorucu@hotmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Computed tomography;
Early treatment;
Temporomandibular joint;
Class II
- MeSH:
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography;
Humans;
Incisor;
Joints;
Malocclusion*;
Mandible;
Palatal Expansion Technique;
Prospective Studies;
Temporomandibular Joint*
- From:The Korean Journal of Orthodontics
2015;45(3):121-129
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess three-dimensional changes in the temporomandibular joint positions and mandibular dimensions after correction of dental factors restricting mandibular growth in patients with Class II division 1 or division 2 malocclusion in the pubertal growth period. METHODS: This prospective clinical study included 14 patients each with Class II division 1 (group I) and Class II division 2 (group II) malocclusions. The quad-helix was used for maxillary expansion, while utility arches were used for intrusion (group I) or protrusion and intrusion (group II) of the maxillary incisors. After approximately 2 months of treatment, an adequate maxillary arch width and acceptable maxillary incisor inclination were obtained. The patients were followed for an average of 6 months. Intraoral and extraoral photographs, plaster models, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were obtained before and after treatment. Lateral cephalometric and temporomandibular joint measurements were made from the CBCT images. RESULTS: The mandibular dimensions increased in both groups, although mandibular positional changes were also found in group II. There were no differences in the condylar position within the mandibular fossa or the condylar dimensions. The mandibular fossa depth and condylar positions were symmetrical at treatment initiation and completion. CONCLUSIONS: Class II malocclusion can be partially corrected by achieving an ideal maxillary arch form, particularly in patients with Class II division 2 malocclusion. Restrictions of the mandible in the transverse or sagittal plane do not affect the temporomandibular joint positions in these patients because of the high adaptability of this joint.
