The Use of FDG PET for Nodal Staging of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
- Author:
Hee Jong BAEK
1
;
Jong Ho PARK
;
Chang Woon CHOI
;
Sang Moo LIM
;
Doo Hwan CHOI
;
Gyung Ja JO
;
Gyung Jun WON
;
Jae Il JO
Author Information
1. Korea Cancer Center Hospital(KCCH), Department of Thoracic Surgery.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Tomography, emission computed;
Lung neoplasm
- MeSH:
Electrons;
Humans;
Lung Neoplasms*;
Lung*;
Lymph Nodes;
Mediastinoscopy;
Prospective Studies;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Thoracotomy;
Thorax;
Tomography, Emission-Computed
- From:The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
1999;32(10):910-915
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography(PEFT) using fluorine-18 deoxyglucose(FDG), showing increased FDG uptake and retention in malignant cells, has been proven to be useful in differentiating malignant from benign tissues. We indertook the prospective study to compare the accuracy of the whole-body FDG PET with that of the conventional chest computed tomography(CT) for nodal staging of non-small-cell lung cancers(NSCLC). MATERIAL AND METHOD: FDG PET and contrast enhanced CT were performed in 36 patients with potentially resectable NSCLC. Each Imaging study was evaluated independently, and nodal stations were localized according to the AJCC regional lymph nodes mapping system. Extensive lymph node dissection(1101 nodes) of ipsi- and contralateral mediastinal nodal stations was performed at thoracotomy and/or mediastinoscopy. Image findings were compared with the histopathologic staging results and were analyzed with the McNema test(p) and Kappa value(k). RESULT: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CT for ipsilateral mediastinal nodal staging were 38%, 68%, 25%, 79%, and 61%, and those of PET were 88%, 71%, 47%, 95%, and 75%(p>0.05, K=0.29). When analyzed by individual nodal group(superior, aortopulmonary window, and inferior), the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CT were 27%, 82%, 22%, 85%, and 73%, and those of PET were 60%, 87%, 92%, and 82%(p<0.05, k=0.27). CONCLUSION: FDG PET in addition to CT appears to be superior to CT alone for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancers.
