Transplantation of canine umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in experimentally induced spinal cord injured dogs.
- Author:
Ji Hey LIM
1
;
Ye Eun BYEON
;
Hak Hyun RYU
;
Yun Hyeok JEONG
;
Young Won LEE
;
Wan Hee KIM
;
Kyung Sun KANG
;
Oh Kyeong KWEON
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords: dog; spinal cord injury; stem cell; transplantation; umbilical cord blood
- MeSH: Animals; Behavior, Animal/physiology; Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/methods/*veterinary; Dog Diseases/pathology/*therapy; Dogs; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory/physiology; Histocytochemistry/veterinary; Magnetic Resonance Imaging/veterinary; Random Allocation; Spinal Cord Injuries/pathology/therapy/*veterinary; Videotape Recording
- From:Journal of Veterinary Science 2007;8(3):275-282
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: This study was to determine the effects of allogenicumbilical cord blood (UCB)-derived mesenchymal stemcells (MSCs) and recombinant methionyl humangranulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rmhGCSF) on acanine spinal cord injury model after balloon compressionat the first lumbar vertebra. Twenty-five adult mongreldogs were assigned to five groups according to treatmentafter a spinal cord injury: no treatment (CN); salinetreatment (CP); rmhGCSF treatment (G); UCB-MSCstreatment (UCB-MSC); co-treatment (UCBG). The UCB-MSCs isolated from cord blood of canine fetuses wereprepared as 10(6) cells/150microl saline. The UCB-MSCs weredirectly injected into the injured site of the spinal cord andrmhGCSF was administered subcutaneously 1 week afterthe induction of spinal cord injury. The Olby score,magnetic resonance imaging, somatosensory evokedpotentials and histopathological examinations were used toevaluate the functional recovery after transplantation. TheOlby scores of all groups were zero at the 0-week evaluation.At 2 week after the transplantation, the Olby scores in thegroups with the UCB-MSC and UCBG were significantlyhigher than in the CN and CP groups. However, there wereno significant differences between the UCB-MSC andUCBG groups, and between the CN and CP groups. Thesecomparisons remained stable at 4 and 8 week aftertransplantation. There was significant improvement in thenerve conduction velocity based on the somatosensory evokedpotentials. In addition, a distinct structural consistency ofthe nerve cell bodies was noted in the lesion of the spinalcord of the UCB-MSC and UCBG groups. These resultssuggest that transplantation of the UCB-MSCs resulted inrecovery of nerve function in dogs with a spinal cord injuryand may be considered as a therapeutic modality for spinalcord injury.
