The Consideration about the Histology and Its Prognosis According to the Gleason Grade System of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma.
- Author:
Doo Jae MAENG
1
;
Duck Ki YOON
Author Information
1. Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
prostatic cancer;
Gleason score;
prognosis
- MeSH:
Adenocarcinoma*;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Mortality;
Neoplasm Grading;
Neoplasm Staging;
Prognosis*;
Prostatic Neoplasms;
Retrospective Studies
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
1988;29(3):381-386
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Prognosis of prostatic carcinoma can be cheefly influenced not by method of treatment, but histological differentiation and tumor stage. We reviewed histologic grade and survival of prostatic carcinoma retrospectively using the Gleason grade system based on gland differentiation and relation between gland and stroma in 25 patients from Jan, 1980 to Jan, 1987, Whom we had follow-up data about. The following results were obtained. 1. The average age of patients was 69 years with a range of 56 to 84 years. 2. We identified 1 patients as grade 2, 4 patients as grade 3, 9 patients as grade 4, 11 patients as grade 5 of total 25 patients. In 2 year survival, there were 100% for low combined Gleason(2-4), 90% for intermediate group(5-7), 80% for high grade. 3. There was close relationship between tumor grade and stage such that high grade is high stage, low grade is in low stage. 4. There were high mortality index(0.102) in high grade group, low mortality index(0.039 %) in low grade group in prostatic index combined Gleason grade with clinical tumor staging.
