A study of Nutritional Improvement in the Patients with Neurologic Disorders by Changing Enteral Feeding Methods.
- Author:
Hee Jung KIM
1
;
Eun Hee KANG
;
Jongho LEE
;
Ohyeon KIM
Author Information
1. Team of Nutrition service, Asan Medical Center, Korea. hj4914@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
protein-calorie malnutrition;
neurologic disorders;
enteral tube feeding;
nutritional improvement;
gastrointestinal intolerances
- MeSH:
Aged;
Body Weight;
Chungcheongnam-do;
Deglutition;
Diarrhea;
Enteral Nutrition*;
Feeding Methods;
Humans;
Ileus;
Lymphocyte Count;
Malnutrition;
Nausea;
Nervous System Diseases*;
Nutritional Requirements;
Nutritional Status;
Parenteral Nutrition;
Protein-Energy Malnutrition;
Residual Volume;
Serum Albumin;
Vomiting
- From:Journal of the Korean Dietetic Association
2004;10(4):442-451
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Protein-calories malnutrition is common among patients in the hospital. In particular, elderly patients with neurologic disorders has more risk of nutritional deficiency due to swallowing difficulty. Enteral tube feeding is more economical, physiological and immunological than parenteral nutrition for patients who have adequate gastrointestinal function. This study was conducted patients with neurologic disorders who received enteral nutrition at Asan Medical Center from February 1 to October 10, 2002. The control group (48 patients) were given traditional feeding methods 4 times a day while the treatment group (45 patients) were given improved feeding methods 3 times a day. We assessed nutritional status of patients and compared to both groups. We investigated body weight, serum albumin, hemoglobin, total lymphocyte count by means of nutrition markers. The objectives of this study is to reduce the time needed for nutritional requirement of patients without an increase in gastrointestinal intolerances. The results of this study are as follows: 1. Nutritional status of many patients in both groups were either malnourished or at risk for malnutrition. 2. The time to arrive to the nutritional requirements were 6.21 +/- 0.35 days for the control group and 4.24 +/- 0.52 days for the treatment group. The treatment group showed a significantly shorter amount of time. 3. The changes of the nutritional marker in the control group showed a significant drop in body weight, serum albumin and serum hemoglobin while the treatment group experienced a significant increase in body weight, serum albumin and total lymphocyte count. 4. Feeding intolerane such as diarrhea, high residual volume, ileus, nausea and vomiting were investigated. Diarrhea found in 25.1% (12 patients) of the control group and 22.2% (10 patients) of the treatment group and these findings are not significant.
