Early Surgical Site Infection Following Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction with or without Acellular Dermal Matrix: National Benchmarking Using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
10.5999/aps.2015.42.2.194
- Author:
Sebastian WINOCOUR
1
;
Jorys MARTINEZ-JORGE
;
Elizabeth HABERMANN
;
Kristine THOMSEN
;
Valerie LEMAINE
Author Information
1. Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. lemaine.valerie@mayo.edu
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Breast implantation;
Acellular dermis;
Benchmarking;
Surgical wound infection
- MeSH:
Acellular Dermis*;
Benchmarking*;
Body Mass Index;
Breast Implantation;
Female;
Humans;
Mammaplasty*;
Operative Time;
Quality Improvement*;
Risk Factors;
Surgical Wound Infection;
Tissue Expansion Devices*
- From:Archives of Plastic Surgery
2015;42(2):194-200
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) result in significant patient morbidity following immediate tissue expander breast reconstruction (ITEBR). This study determined a single institution's 30-day SSI rate and benchmarked it against that among national institutions participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). METHODS: Women who underwent ITEBR with/without acellular dermal matrix (ADM) were identified using the ACS-NSQIP database between 2005 and 2011. Patient characteristics associated with the 30-day SSI rate were determined, and differences in rates between our institution and the national database were assessed. RESULTS: 12,163 patients underwent ITEBR, including 263 at our institution. SSIs occurred in 416 (3.4%) patients nationwide excluding our institution, with lower rates observed at our institution (1.9%). Nationwide, SSIs were significantly more common in ITEBR patients with ADM (4.5%) compared to non-ADM patients (3.2%, P=0.005), and this trend was observed at our institution (2.1% vs. 1.6%, P=1.00). A multivariable analysis of all institutions identified age > or =50 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.4; confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.7), body mass index > or =30 kg/m2 vs. <25 kg/m2 (OR, 3.4; CI, 2.6-4.5), and operative time >4.25 hours (OR, 1.9; CI, 1.5-2.4) as risk factors for SSIs. Our institutional SSI rate was lower than the nationwide rate (OR, 0.4; CI, 0.2-1.1), although this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: The 30-day SSI rate at our institution in patients who underwent ITEBR was lower than the nation. SSIs occurred more frequently in procedures involving ADM both nationally and at our institution.
