Surgical Outcomes and Safety of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
- Author:
Hyun Hwan SUNG
1
;
Kwang Jin KO
;
Yoon Seok SUH
;
Gyu Ha RYU
;
Kyu Sung LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Pelvic Organ Prolapse; Uterine Prolapse; Robotic Sacrocolpopexy; Robotic Surgical Procedures
- MeSH: Conversion to Open Surgery; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intraoperative Complications; Length of Stay; Patient Satisfaction; Pelvic Floor; Pelvic Organ Prolapse*; Prolapse; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Telephone; Uterine Prolapse
- From:International Neurourology Journal 2017;21(1):68-74
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the surgical outcomes and safety of robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) in patients with uterine/vaginal vault prolapse. METHODS: Between January 2009 and June 2015, 16 women with apical prolapse underwent RSC. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) examination was performed, and treatment success was defined as the presence of grade 0 or I apical prolapse upon POP-Q examination at the final follow-up. Pelvic floor distress inventory-short form 20 (PFDI-SF 20) was administered at every follow-up. A treatment satisfaction questionnaire was administered by telephone to evaluate patient satisfaction with the operation. RESULTS: Median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56–68 years), and follow-up duration was 25.3 months (IQR, 5.4–34.0 months). Thirteen women (81.3%) had ≥grade III apical prolapse. Operation time was 251 minutes (IQR, 236–288 minutes), and blood loss was 75 mL (IQR, 50–150 mL). Median hospital stay was 4 days (IQR, 3–5 days). At the final follow-up, treatment success was reported in all patients, who presented grade 0 (n=8, 57.1%) and grade I (n=6, 42.9%) apical prolapse. Dramatic improvements in PFDI-SF 20 scores were noted after RSC (from 39 to 4; P=0.001). Most patients (12 of 13) were satisfied with RSC. An intraoperative complication (sacral venous plexus injury) was reported in 1 patient, and there was no conversion to open surgery. Mesh erosion was not reported. CONCLUSIONS: RSC is an efficient and safe surgical option for apical prolapse repair. Most patients were satisfied with RSC. Thus, RSC might be one of the best treatment options for apical prolapse in women.
