Central Venous Obstruction in Hemodialysis Patients: The Usefulness of Percutaneous Treatment.
10.3348/jkrs.2002.46.4.343
- Author:
Cheol Young KIM
1
;
Dong Erk GOO
;
Dae Ho KIM
;
Hyun Suk HONG
;
Hae Kyoung LEE
;
Duk Lin CHOI
;
Sung Boo YANG
;
Chul MOON
Author Information
1. Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University. degoo@hosp.sch.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Dialysis;
Veins, stenosis or obstruction;
Veins, subclavian;
Veins, transluminal angioplasty
- MeSH:
Angioplasty;
Catheters;
Constriction, Pathologic;
Dialysis;
Humans;
Renal Dialysis*;
Rupture;
Stents;
Subclavian Vein
- From:Journal of the Korean Radiological Society
2002;46(4):343-349
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To analyse the effectiveness of percutaneous treatment of central venous obstruction in patients undergoing hemodialysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 100 patients, 107 central venous strictures [56 subclavian (occlusion:21, stenosis:35) and 51 innominate (occlusion:23, stenosis:28)] were assessed, and 170 percutaneous angioplasty procedures were performed. Balloon dilation of the venous lumen was the preferred mode, but if dilation was incomplete we inserted a stent at the site of the stricture. Technical success, procedural complications and the long-term patency rate were evaluated, and the patency difference according to location and degree of stricture, the existence of DM, and any history of central catheter insertion were also determined. RESULTS: We inserted 52 stents in 170 procedures, in 157 (92.4%) of which initial technical success was achieved. Stent migration occurred in two cases and balloon rupture in three. The 6- and 12-month primary patency rates were 46.2% and 24.1%, respectively, and the mean patency rate was 8.5 months. The 1-, 2- and 3-year accumulative patency rates were 59.8%, 47.5% and 35.7%, respectively, and the mean patency rate was 23.5 months. Other than in the history of central catheter insertion, there were no statistically significant differences in patency rates (p=0.0128). CONCLUSION: In hemodialysis patients with a central venous stricture, percutaneous angioplasty is a safe and useful procedure, but to maintain long-term central venous patency, repeated interventions are required.
