The clinical application of the sliding loop technique for renorrhaphy during robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Surgical technique and outcomes.
10.4111/kju.2015.56.11.762
- Author:
Hyung Suk KIM
1
;
Young Ju LEE
;
Ja Hyeon KU
;
Cheol KWAK
;
Hyeon Hoe KIM
;
Chang Wook JEONG
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. drboss@korea.com
- Publication Type:Evaluation Studies ; Original Article
- Keywords:
Nephrectomy;
Renorrhphy;
Small renal mass;
Technique
- MeSH:
Adult;
Aged;
Female;
Hemostasis, Surgical/methods;
Humans;
Kidney Neoplasms/*surgery;
Laparoscopy/methods;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Nephrectomy/*methods;
Patient Positioning/methods;
Robotic Surgical Procedures/*methods;
*Suture Techniques;
Treatment Outcome
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
2015;56(11):762-768
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To report the initial clinical outcomes of the newly devised sliding loop technique (SLT) used for renorrhaphy in patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) for small renal mass. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the surgical videos and medical charts of 31 patients who had undergone RALPN with the SLT renorrhaphy performed by two surgeons (CWJ and CK) between January 2014 and October 2014. SLT renorrhaphy was performed after tumor excision and renal parenchymal defect repair. Assessed outcomes included renorrhaphy time (RT), warm ischemic time, perioperative complications, and perioperative renal function change. RT was defined as interval from the end of bed suture to the renal artery declamping. RESULTS: In all patients, sliding loop renorrhaphy was successfully conducted without conversions to radical nephrectomy or open approaches. Mean renorrhaphy and warm ischemic time were 9.0 and 22.6 minutes, respectively. After completing renorrhaphy, there were no adverse events such as dehiscence of approximated renal parenchyma, renal parenchymal tearing, or significant bleeding. Furthermore, no postoperative complications or significant renal function decline were observed as of the last follow-up for all patients. The limitations of this study include the small volume case series, the retrospective nature of the study, and the heterogeneity of surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: From our initial clinical experience, SLT may be an efficient and safe renorrhaphy method in real clinical practice. Further large scale, prospective, long-term follow-up, and direct comparative studies with other techniques are required to confirm the clinical applicability of SLT.
