Recurrent Bleeding After Arterial Embolization in Patients with Hemoptysis: Comparison of Angiographic Findings and Relapsing Period.
10.3348/jkrs.2001.45.6.589
- Author:
Sung Keun PARK
1
;
Seok Jin CHOI
;
Gi Bok CHOI
;
Hae Yeon KIM
;
Auh Whan PARK
;
Jae Ryang JUHN
;
Seong Sook CHA
Author Information
1. Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Inje University.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Lung, hemorrhage;
Arteries, therapeutic embolization;
Arteries, bronchial
- MeSH:
Angiography;
Arteries;
Bronchial Arteries;
Hemoptysis*;
Hemorrhage*;
Humans;
Incidence;
Recurrence;
Retrospective Studies
- From:Journal of the Korean Radiological Society
2001;45(6):589-596
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To describe the angiographic findings of patients with recurrent hemoptysis after bronchial artery embolization (BAE) according to the point at which relapse occurred. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 125 patients who underwent BAE due to hemoptysis between 1996 and 2000, we selected 18 of 23 who underwent additional BAE due to recurrent bleeding after initial BAE . Depending on the point at which relapse occurred, they were divided into two groups (I and II, according to whether additional BAE was performed within two weeks of initial BAE or more than two weeks after this). We retrospectively compared the two groups in terms of angiographic findings, number of embolized arteries, and character of feeding arteries at initial and additional BAE. RESULTS: Nine patients in group I (additional BAE: n=10) and nine in group II (additional BAE: n=13) were admitted for recurrent hemoptysis within two weeks of initial BAE and more than two weeks after this, respectively. In group I(n=29) and II(n=31), angiography demonstrated two direct and 27 indirect, and two direct and 29 indirect signs of hemorrhage, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed (x2=0.005, p=0.945). Among the embolized feeder ressels in group I (n=30) there were 20 bronchial artery and 10 non bronchial systemic collaterals, while for group II(n=35), the corresponding totals were 21 and 14. Again, no statistically significant differences were encountered(x2=0.308; p=0.579). In group I, feeders were newly developed in one case(10%), previously embolized in five(50%), and missed in four(40%), while in group two the corresponding figures were none, twelve(92.3%), and one(7.7%). No significant differences were noted, though the incidence of previously embolized feeders in Group II was very high (x2=5.383, p=0.068). CONCLUSION: Among patients in whom hemoptysis after BAE recurred at different times, the angiographic findings and number of embolized arteries were not significantly different, but differences in the nature of the feeder were noted. Patients in whom hemoptysis recurred more than two weeks after BAE showed more recanalization of previously embolized feeders than those in whom there was recurrence within two weeks.
