Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Copenhagen Psyco-social Questionnaire Scale.
- Author:
Kyung Ja JUNE
;
Eun Suk CHOI
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire;
Reliability;
Validity;
Work environments
- MeSH:
Focus Groups;
Job Satisfaction;
Logistic Models;
Phenothiazines;
Surveys and Questionnaires;
Reproducibility of Results;
Weights and Measures
- From:Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing
2013;22(1):1-12
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: This study aims to test the validity and criteria-related reliability of the Korean version of the Copenhagen Psyco-social Questionnaire version II (COPSOQ-K) assessing the psychosocial working environment. METHODS: The COPSOQ-K was developed through forward-backward translation techniques, and revision based on feedback from focus groups. Survey data were collected from 311 office workers who worked in one workplace. An internal consistency reliability was estimated by Cronbach's alpha. The impacts of the COPSOQ-K scales on job satisfaction, self-rated health, stress, sleeping troubles, burnout, and sickness absence were analyzed with multiple regression model or multiple logistic regression model, adjusted age and gender using SAS version 9.3. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the COPSOQ-K scales and Korean job stress and its subdomain were identified. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha of COPSOQ-K scales was adequate or good (0.66~0.87). The major COPSOQ-K scales predict job satisfaction, self-rated health, stress, sleeping troubles burnout, and sickness absence. The major COPSOQ-K scales were correlated with Korean job stress and its subdomain. CONCLUSION: The COPSOQ-K scales have satisfactory reliability and criteria-related validity. The COPSOQ-K scales will be useful for the future studies and practices associated with psychosocial working environment.
