Physicochemical characterization of porcine bone-derived grafting material and comparison with bovine xenografts for dental applications.
10.5051/jpis.2017.47.6.388
- Author:
Jung Heon LEE
1
;
Gyu Sung YI
;
Jin Woong LEE
;
Deug Joong KIM
Author Information
1. School of Advanced Materials Science and Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea. jhlee7@skku.edu, kimdj@skku.edu
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Bioprosthesis;
Chemical phenomena;
Dental materials;
Durapatite;
Heterografts
- MeSH:
Adsorption;
Bioprosthesis;
Bone Regeneration;
Bone Transplantation;
Chemical Phenomena;
Dental Materials;
Durapatite;
Heterografts*;
Methods;
Microscopy, Atomic Force;
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning;
Porosity;
Spectrum Analysis;
Surgery, Oral;
Transplants*;
X-Ray Diffraction
- From:Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science
2017;47(6):388-401
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The physicochemical properties of a xenograft are very important because they strongly influence the bone regeneration capabilities of the graft material. Even though porcine xenografts have many advantages, only a few porcine xenografts are commercially available, and most of their physicochemical characteristics have yet to be reported. Thus, in this work we aimed to investigate the physicochemical characteristics of a porcine bone grafting material and compare them with those of 2 commercially available bovine xenografts to assess the potential of xenogenic porcine bone graft materials for dental applications. METHODS: We used various characterization techniques, such as scanning electron microscopy, the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller adsorption method, atomic force microscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and others, to compare the physicochemical properties of xenografts of different origins. RESULTS: The porcine bone grafting material had relatively high porosity (78.4%) and a large average specific surface area (SSA; 69.9 m²/g), with high surface roughness (10-point average roughness, 4.47 µm) and sub-100-nm hydroxyapatite crystals on the surface. Moreover, this material presented a significant fraction of sub-100-nm pores, with negligible amounts of residual organic substances. Apart from some minor differences, the overall characteristics of the porcine bone grafting material were very similar to those of one of the bovine bone grafting material. However, many of these morphostructural properties were significantly different from the other bovine bone grafting material, which exhibited relatively smooth surface morphology with a porosity of 62.0% and an average SSA of 0.5 m²/g. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that both bovine bone grafting materials have been successfully used in oral surgery applications in the last few decades, this work shows that the porcine-derived grafting material possesses most of the key physiochemical characteristics required for its application as a highly efficient xenograft material for bone replacement.
