Current Status of Hospital-based Health Promotion Programs in Korea and the Factors Influencing Their Introduction.
- Author:
Sang Gyu LEE
1
;
Choon Seon PARK
;
Myung Guen KANG
;
Myung Il HAHM
;
Soon Young LEE
;
Woo Hyun CHO
Author Information
1. Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Health Promotion;
Hospital administration;
Organizational innovation
- MeSH:
Chief Executive Officers, Hospital;
Health Promotion*;
Hospital Administration;
Hospitals, Private;
Hospitals, Public;
Humans;
Korea*;
Logistic Models;
Organizational Innovation;
Postal Service
- From:Korean Journal of Preventive Medicine
2001;34(4):399-407
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the current status of hospital-based health promotion programs in Korea and to elucidate the factors which affect to the process of implementation. METHODS: We conducted a mail survey of all 875 hospitals in Korea from March to May 2001. In reference to 12 specific kinds of health promotion programs, hospital CEOs were asked whether their hospital have such programs, whether they are fully staffed and whether the program is paid for by the patients. Contextual factors(location, hospital type, number of beds, length of operation, public/private status, economic level of the community, the level of competition) and organizational factors (the extent of market, compatibility with vision, formalization), strategic types of the CEOs (defender/analyser/prospector) were also surveyed. The relationships between each variable and the implementation of health promotion services, activation of services, and the target groups(patient/community resident) were analyzed by univariate analysis and the independent effects of these variables were examined with multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: 106 of 125 hospitals responding (84.8%) had more than one health promotion program. However, they showed fluctuations in the adoption rate of each programs, meaning that comprehensive health promotion services were not provided. Many programs were not fully staffed and few hospitals had paid programs. In factors affecting health promotion service implementation, private hospitals showed a higher rate in implementation than public hospitals. In contrast, when the competition among nearby hospitals was intense, the level of implementation of service lowered. In the strategic type of the CEOs, the prospectors were shown to have instituted more health promotion programs in their hospitals and the analysers had a greater tendency to have programs for community residents than the defenders. CONCLUSION: Considering the above results, contextual factors may contribute greatly to the introduction of health promotion services in Korean hospital, although the CEO's personal preference and organizational factors play a larger role in the activation of services. Additionally, the CEO's personal preference may be the major influencing factor in the introduction of programs for community residents.
