The Usefulness of Ice-water Test in the Patients with Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Associated with Overactive Bladder.
- Author:
Chang Duck SEO
1
;
Dae Yul YANG
;
Hayoung KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul, Korea. hykim@hall ym.or.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH);
Overactive bladder;
Urodynamics
- MeSH:
Catheters;
Diagnosis;
Dysuria;
Humans;
Ice;
Nocturia;
Prostatic Hyperplasia*;
Rivers;
Supine Position;
Urinary Bladder;
Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic;
Urinary Bladder, Overactive*;
Urinary Incontinence, Urge;
Urodynamics;
Water
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
2005;46(8):799-804
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Purpose: A video-urodynamic study is known as the most accurate test to differentiate between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with overactive bladder and detrusor instability but requires expensive equipment and an expert technique, so is not commonly available. We performed a video- urodynamic study and ice-water test which is easily performed for the diagnosis of a neurogenic bladder in the patients with symptomatic BPH associated with overactive bladder and compared the results. Materials and Methods: The video-urodynamic study using a 10-Fr triple lumen urodynamic catheter was performed in 36 patients with symptomatic BPH associated with overactive bladder that had frequency, weak stream, nocturia, urgency, urge incontinence, dysuria and no clinical neurogenic defect. After the video-urodynamic study, the ice-water test was performed by instilling 4degreesC sterilized water through a catheter at 200ml/ min in the supine position. The volume instilled was about 30% of the bladder capacity. The ice-water test was positive if there was an efflux of water around the catheter during or after water instillation. Results: Thirty two of the 36 symptomatic BPH patients with an overactive bladder were negative on the ice-water test. All 32 patients who had a negative ice-water test were BPH with overactive bladder on the video- urodynamic study. Four of the 36 symptomatic BPH patients with an overactive bladder were positive on the ice-water test. Two of the 4 patients who had a positive ice-water test were BPH with overactive bladder and the other two were detrusor instability on the video-urodynamic study. Conclusions: Therefore, in case of a positive ice water test, a video-urodynamic study is needed to differentiate between BPH with overactive bladder and detrusor instability in patients with symptomatic BPH associated with overactive bladder.
