Nomogram Estimating the Probability of Intraabdominal Abscesses after Gastrectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer.
10.5230/jgc.2015.15.4.262
- Author:
Bang Wool EOM
1
;
Jungnam JOO
;
Young Woo KIM
;
Boram PARK
;
Hong Man YOON
;
Keun Won RYU
;
Soo Jin KIM
Author Information
1. Gastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea. gskim@ncc.re.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Stomach neoplasms;
Postoperative complications;
Abdominal abscess;
Nomograms
- MeSH:
Abdominal Abscess;
Abscess*;
Bias (Epidemiology);
Body Temperature;
C-Reactive Protein;
Calibration;
Classification;
Dataset;
Discrimination (Psychology);
Gastrectomy*;
Glucose;
Humans;
Incidence;
Leukocyte Count;
Logistic Models;
Multivariate Analysis;
Nomograms*;
Postoperative Complications;
Postoperative Period;
Retrospective Studies;
Stomach Neoplasms*
- From:Journal of Gastric Cancer
2015;15(4):262-269
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Intraabdominal abscess is one of the most common reasons for re-hospitalization after gastrectomy. This study aimed to develop a model for estimating the probability of intraabdominal abscesses that can be used during the postoperative period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological data of 1,564 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer between 2010 and 2012. Twenty-six related markers were analyzed, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to develop the probability estimation model for intraabdominal abscess. Internal validation using a bootstrap approach was employed to correct for bias, and the model was then validated using an independent dataset comprising of patients who underwent gastrectomy between January 2008 and March 2010. Discrimination and calibration abilities were checked in both datasets. RESULTS: The incidence of intraabdominal abscess in the development set was 7.80% (122/1,564). The surgical approach, operating time, pathologic N classification, body temperature, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein level, glucose level, and change in the hemoglobin level were significant predictors of intraabdominal abscess in the multivariate analysis. The probability estimation model that was developed on the basis of these results showed good discrimination and calibration abilities (concordance index=0.828, Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-statistic P=0.274). Finally, we combined both datasets to produce a nomogram that estimates the probability of intraabdominal abscess. CONCLUSIONS: This nomogram can be useful for identifying patients at a high risk of intraabdominal abscess. Patients at a high risk may benefit from further evaluation or treatment before discharge.
