Comparison of CPR Outcomes between Autopulse TM and Manual Compression in Adult Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest.
- Author:
Gyu Keun HAN
1
;
Seok Yong RYU
;
Hye Jin KIM
;
Sang Lae LEE
;
Suk Jin CHO
;
Sung Chan OH
Author Information
1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Sanggye paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Seoul, Korea. ryuchoi64@paik.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation;
Compression device;
Heart arrest
- MeSH:
Adult;
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation;
Electrocardiography;
Heart Arrest;
Humans;
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest;
Resuscitation;
Retrospective Studies;
Survival Rate
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
2009;20(3):256-263
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Our goal was to compare resuscitation outcomes, 24 hour survival, and survival discharge between patients resuscitated with an AutoPulse compression device vs. those resuscitated using manual compression in adult, out-of-hospital non-traumatic cardiac arrest patients. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest that occurred between July 2005 and June 2008. We included, 267 non-traumatic patients who had. We compared characteristics between 93 patients who had AutoPulse compression and 174 patients who had manual compression. Characteristics included resuscitation outcomes (return of spontaneous circulation [ROSC], 24 hour survival and resuscitation outcomes according to the initial ECG. RESULTS: The rate of ROSC was 43.1% for AutoPulse compression and 50.57% for manual compression; the difference was not significant (p=0.294). Survival rates at 24 hours were, respectively, 33.3% and 31.6% (p=0.88). Survival discharge proportions were, 8.6% and 11.5%, respectively (p=0.599). CONCLUSION: There are no statistically significant differences in resuscitation outcomes between AutoPulse and manual compression in adult, out-of-hospital, non-traumatic, cardiac arrest patients.
