Hospital Qualities Related to Return to Work from Occupational Injury after Controlling for Injury Severity as Well as Occupational Characteristics.
10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.695
- Author:
Jong Uk WON
1
;
Hongdeok SEOK
;
Jeongbae RHIE
;
Jin Ha YOON
Author Information
1. The Institute for Occupational Health, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. flyinyou@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Health Care Quality, Access and Evaluation;
Occupational Injuries;
Rehabilitation;
Return to Work
- MeSH:
Adult;
Databases, Factual;
Demography;
Disability Evaluation;
Female;
Hospitals;
Humans;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Occupational Diseases/*pathology/rehabilitation;
Odds Ratio;
*Quality Assurance, Health Care;
Republic of Korea;
*Return to Work;
Risk;
Severity of Illness Index;
Workers' Compensation
- From:Journal of Korean Medical Science
2016;31(5):695-701
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
We examined associations between hospital quality in the workers' compensation system and injured patients' return to work after controlling for injury severity, occupational factors, and demographic factors. Return to work data of injured workers were constructed from 2 datasets: 23,392 patients injured in 2009-2011 from the Korea Workers' Compensation & Welfare Service and return to work data from Korea Employment Information Services. After de-identifying the data, quality scores were matched for each hospital that cared for injured patients. Injury severity was measured by Abbreviated Injury Scales. Relative risk and 95% confidence interval were calculated using log binomial regression models. After adjusting for age, sex, injury severity, occupation, factory size, city, and hospital type, the relative risk (95% confidence interval) for the total score was 1.04 (1.02-1.06), 1.06 (1.04-1.09), and 1.07 (1.05-1.10) in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartiles, respectively, compared to the 1st quartile. The RR (95% CI) in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartiles was 1.05 (1.02-1.07), 1.05 (1.02-1.08), and 1.06 (1.04-1.09) for the process score; and 1.02 (1.01-1.04), 1.05 (1.03-1.07), and 1.06 (1.04-1.09) for the outcome score compared to the 1st quartile score, respectively. In conclusion, our study design with blinded merge methods shows that total, process, and outcome qualities are related to the return to work of injured workers after controlling for other factors.
