Comparison of crown designs of different dental occupational groups, using CAD-CAM.
10.4047/jkap.2016.54.3.234
- Author:
Taehyeon KIM
1
;
Jong Eun KIM
;
Ah Reum LEE
;
Young Bum PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea. drybpark@yuhs.ac
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Computer aided design-computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM);
Design software;
Proficiency
- MeSH:
Computer-Aided Design*;
Crowns*;
Dental Technicians;
Dentists;
Humans;
Molar;
Occupational Groups*
- From:The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2016;54(3):234-238
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Increasing use of computer aided design-computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) system and number of design software made design of restoration easy and quick. Outcome of restoration has been dependent on dental technician's wax up proficiency, dentists can design restoration for themselves now. This study aims to investigate the outcome of restoration designs, according to handling skill of CAD-CAM design tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A patient's mandibular right 1st molar was prepared. After taking impression, stone model was made, scanned the stone model with 3 shape intra-oral scanner, stereolithography (STL) file was extracted. With 3shape dental designer, one dental technician with more than 5 years work experience (designer 0) and three dental technicians with less than 2years work experience (designer 1, 2, 3-group DT) and 4 1st year residents (designer 4, 5, 6, 7-group RT) designed gold crown on the same STL file. Designed crown's MD (mesio-distal) and BL (bucco-lingual) diameter, height of crown, inter-cuspal distance, number of occlusal contact points were compared. Statistical analysis was carried out, test of normality within each group, using independent t-test. Number of contact points were compared, using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between group DT and group RT. Number of contact points also resulted in no significant difference. CONCLUSION: The outcome of each designed crowns showed no statistical differences, in values which can be expressed as numbers. Subjective factors were different. With increasing proficiency in handling designing software, fabrication of restorations according to each designer's occlusal concept can be made easy.
