Clinical evaluation of the removable partial dentures with implant fixed prostheses.
10.4047/jkap.2016.54.3.239
- Author:
Soo Hyun KANG
1
;
Seong Kyun KIM
;
Seong Joo HEO
;
Jai Young KOAK
;
Joo Hee LEE
;
Ji Man PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. ksy0617@snu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Dental implant;
Removable partial denture;
Implant supported denture
- MeSH:
Bone Resorption;
Classification;
Clinical Study;
Dental Implants;
Dental Porcelain;
Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported;
Dentition;
Denture, Partial, Removable*;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Male;
Prognosis;
Prostheses and Implants*;
Retrospective Studies;
Splints;
Tooth;
Tooth Fractures
- From:The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2016;54(3):239-245
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify clinical complications in removable partial denture (RPD) with implant-supported surveyed prostheses, and to analyze the factors associated with the complications such as location of the implant, splinting adjacent prostheses, the type of retentive clasps, Kennedy classification, and opposing dentition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective clinical study was carried out for 11 patients (7 male, 4 female), mean age of 67.5, who received RPD with Implant-supported surveyed prostheses between 2000 and 2016. The mechanical complications of 11 RPDs and 37 supporting implant prostheses and the state of natural teeth and peripheral soft tissue were examined. Then the factors associated with the complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The average of 3.4 implant-supported prostheses were used for each RPD. Complications found during the follow-up period of an average of 42.1 months were in order of dislodgement of temporary cement-retained prostheses, opposing tooth fracture/mobility, screw fracture/loosening, clasp loosening, veneer porcelain fracture, marginal bone resorption and mobility of implant, artificial tooth fracture. Complications occurred more frequently in anterior region compared to posterior region, non-splinted prostheses compared to splinted prostheses, surveyed prostheses applied by wrought wire clasp compared to other clasps, and natural dentition compared to other removable prostheses as opposing dentition. There were no significant differences in complications according to the Kennedy classification. CONCLUSION: All implant-assisted RPD functioned successfully throughout the follow-up. However, further clinical studies are necessary because the clinical evidences are still not enough to guarantee the satisfactory prognosis of implant-assisted RPD for long-term result.
