Anterior Vaginal Wall Sling for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence .
- Author:
Kyu Sung LEE
;
Myung Soo CHOO
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Stress urinary incontinence;
Anterior vaginal wall sling
- MeSH:
Classification;
Female*;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Leg;
Outcome Assessment (Health Care);
Urinary Bladder;
Urinary Incontinence*;
Urinary Incontinence, Urge;
Urinary Retention;
Urodynamics
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
1998;39(7):689-693
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The vaginal wall sling was introduced by Raz as a simpler and lessmorbid alternative to fascial or synthetic slings for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of anterior vaginal wall sling in the management of women with anatomical incontinence(Al) and intrinsic sphincteric deficiency(ISD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed vaginal wall sling on 46 consecutive women with stress incontinence. Preoperative evaluation included voiding cystourethrogaphy, urodynamic study, cystocsopy and incontinence staging with SEAPI classification. Postoperative subjective SEAPI outcome measures and assessment of complications were checked on a 3-month basis. RESULTS: Of the patients 19(49%) had Al and 27(59%) had ISD. Median follow-up was 8 months (range 6 to 10). Mean operation time was 65 minutes. At follow-up all of the patients reported no stress incontinence and 15% reported urge incontinence. De novo urge incontinence did not occur. Complications included prolonged voiding difficulty(8,7%), suprapubic pain(8.7%), and pain on leg abduction(4.3%). Four patients had a prolonged time to gain complete bladder emptying, which required more than 3 weeks to resolve. Permanent urinary retention has not occurred in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal wall sling is a safe, simple and effective procedure for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence due to Al and ISD.
