Future directions for the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency.
10.5124/jkma.2015.58.6.484
- Author:
Hyoung Wook PARK
1
Author Information
1. Department of Social Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea. hywopark@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Editorial
- Keywords:
Medical malpractice;
Medical dispute;
Negotiation;
Korea
- MeSH:
Budgets;
Dissent and Disputes*;
Jurisprudence;
Korea;
Negotiating*;
United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
- From:Journal of the Korean Medical Association
2015;58(6):484-486
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Three years have passed since the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency (KMDMAA) was established. In this time, its performance has fallen far short of expectations. Currently, both the KMDMAA and the Korea Consumer Agency (KCA) are responsible for alternative medical dispute resolution in Korea. In the most recent National Assembly administration inspection, Rep. Kim Jae Won of the Saenuri Party made the criticism that in 2013 the KMDMAA spent more than 13 times the budget of the KCA, but did not achieve significantly improved results. An analysis of the relevant law reveals that the KMDMAA has a much more advantageous legal and financial position than the KCA. Mediation takes the form of alternative dispute resolution in place of court adjudication. Mediation is a voluntary process and generally only succeeds when both parties agree. The mediator must be impartial and should aid parties in arriving at a mutually agreed-upon outcome. However, the KMDMAA has failed to build a trusting relationship with medical professionals, and has instead sought power to rule over them. The agency should be aware that power over medical personnel might deter mediation processes, which are based on the spontaneity and trust of both parties. The Department of Health and Human Services and the National Assembly also need to understand the essence of this problem and seek to remedy it.
