The Effect of Temporary Filling Materials on The Adhesion between Dentin Adhesive-coated Surface and Resin Inlay.
10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.6.553
- Author:
Tae Gun KIM
1
;
Kwang Won LEE
;
Mi Kyung YU
Author Information
1. Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University, Korea. mkyou102@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Low-viscosity composite resin;
Microtensile bond strength;
Resin-coating surface;
Caviton;
Tembond;
Provifil
- MeSH:
Analysis of Variance;
Calcium Sulfate;
Citrus sinensis;
Dental Cements;
Dentin;
Inlays;
Petrolatum;
Resin Cements;
Root Canal Filling Materials;
Tokyo;
Vinyl Compounds;
Zinc Oxide
- From:Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
2008;33(6):553-559
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The purpose of this research was to compare the microtensile bond strength of resin coated surface and resin inlay according temporary filling materials prior to applying self-adhesive resin cement. Caviton(GC, Japan), Provifil(Promedica, Neumunster, Germany), Provifil(Promedica, Neumunster, Germany) & petrolatum, and Eugenol-based cement, Tembond(Kerr, Orange CA, USA) were used as temporary filling materials. After fabrication of Tescera(Bisco, Schamburg IL, USA), it was bonded with a self-adhesive resin cement, Rely X unicem(3M, St. Paul. Minn, USA). After this procedure, the microtensile bond strength was measured and it was analyzed through one-way ANOVA and Duncan test(p<0.05). Caviton(GC, Tokyo, Japan) showed statistical difference except for the control(group I) and the saliva(group II)(p<0.05). Provifil(group IV), Provifil & petroneum(group V), Tembond(group VI) had lower microtensile bond strength.
