Effectiveness of digital subtraction radiography in detecting artificially created osteophytes and erosions in the temporomandibular joint.
- Author:
Husniye DEMIRTURK KOCASARAC
1
;
Peruze CELENK
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Subtraction Technique; Osteophyte; Radiography, Panoramic; Temporomandibular Joint; Osteoarthritis
- MeSH: Humans; Osteoarthritis; Osteophyte*; Radiography*; Radiography, Panoramic; ROC Curve; Skull; Subtraction Technique; Temporomandibular Joint*
- From:Imaging Science in Dentistry 2017;47(2):99-107
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: Erosions and osteophytes are radiographic characteristics that are found in different stages of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis. This study assessed the effectiveness of digital subtraction radiography (DSR) in diagnosing simulated osteophytes and erosions in the TMJ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five intact, dry human skulls were used to assess the effectiveness of DSR in detecting osteophytes. Four cortical bone chips of varying thicknesses (0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2.0 mm) were placed at the medial, central, and lateral aspects of the condyle anterior surface. Two defects of varying depth (1.0 mm and 1.5 mm) were created on the lateral, central, and medial poles of the condyles of 2 skulls to simulate erosions. Panoramic images of the condyles were acquired before and after artificially creating the changes. Digital subtraction was performed with Emago dental image archiving software. Five observers familiar with the interpretation of TMJ radiographs evaluated the images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the imaging methods. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve (Az) value for the overall diagnostic accuracy of DSR in detecting osteophytic changes was 0.931. The Az value for the overall diagnostic accuracy of panoramic imaging was 0.695. The accuracy of DSR in detecting erosive changes was 0.854 and 0.696 for panoramic imaging. DSR was remarkably more accurate than panoramic imaging in detecting simulated osteophytic and erosive changes. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of panoramic imaging in detecting degenerative changes was significantly lower than the accuracy of DSR (P<.05). DSR improved the accuracy of detection using panoramic images.
