Mortality risk factor analysis in colonic perforation: would retroperitoneal contamination increase mortality in colonic perforation?.
10.4174/astr.2017.93.4.203
- Author:
Ri Na YOO
1
;
Bong Hyeon KYE
;
Gun KIM
;
Hyung Jin KIM
;
Hyeon Min CHO
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea. hj@catholic.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Retroperitoneal space;
Intestinal perforations;
Postoperative complications;
Sepsis;
Mortality
- MeSH:
Classification;
Colon*;
Comorbidity;
Humans;
Inflammation;
Intestinal Perforation;
Ischemia;
Mortality*;
Postoperative Complications;
Retroperitoneal Space;
Retrospective Studies;
Risk Factors*;
Sepsis
- From:Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017;93(4):203-208
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Colonic perforation is a lethal condition presenting high morbidity and mortality in spite of urgent surgical treatment. This study investigated the surgical outcome of patients with colonic perforation associated with retroperitoneal contamination. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed for 30 patients diagnosed with colonic perforation caused by either inflammation or ischemia who underwent urgent surgical treatment in our facility from January 2005 to December 2014. Patient characteristics were analyzed to find risk factors correlated with increased postoperative mortality. Using the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) audit system, the mortality and morbidity rates were estimated to verify the surgical outcomes. Patients with retroperitoneal contamination, defined by the presence of retroperitoneal air in the preoperative abdominopelvic CT, were compared to those without retroperitoneal contamination. RESULTS: Eight out of 30 patients (26.7%) with colonic perforation had died after urgent surgical treatment. Factors associated with mortality included age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, and the ischemic cause of colonic perforation. Three out of 6 patients (50%) who presented retroperitoneal contamination were deceased. Although the patients with retroperitoneal contamination did not show significant increase in the mortality rate, they showed significantly higher ASA physical status classification than those without retroperitoneal contamination. The mortality rate predicted from Portsmouth POSSUM was higher in the patients with retroperitoneal contamination. CONCLUSION: Patients presenting colonic perforation along with retroperitoneal contamination demonstrated severe comorbidity. However, retroperitoneal contamination was not found to be correlated with the mortality rate.
