Development of the Perceived Stress Inventory: A New Questionnaire for Korean Population Surveys.
10.4082/kjfm.2015.36.6.286
- Author:
Eon Sook LEE
1
;
Ho Cheol SHIN
;
Jun Hyung LEE
;
Yun Jun YANG
;
Jung Jin CHO
;
Gwiyeoroo AHN
;
Yeong Sook YOON
;
Eunju SUNG
Author Information
1. Department of Family Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Stress;
Measurement;
Factor Analysis, Statistical;
Validity;
Reliability
- MeSH:
Anxiety;
Depression;
Epidemiologic Studies;
Factor Analysis, Statistical;
Humans;
Korea
- From:Korean Journal of Family Medicine
2015;36(6):286-293
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Given emerging evidence of the association between stress and disease, practitioners need a tool for measuring stress. Several instruments exist to measure perceived stress; however, none of them are applicable for population surveys because stress conceptualization can differ by population. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Perceived Stress Inventory (PSI) and its short version for use in population surveys and clinical practice in Korea. METHODS: From a pool of perceived stress items collected from three widely used instruments, 20 items were selected for the new measurement tool. Nine of these items were selected for the short version. We evaluated the validity of the items using exploratory factor analysis of the preliminary data. To evaluate the convergent validity of the PSI, 387 healthy people were recruited and stratified on the basis of age and sex. Confirmatory analyses and examination of structural stability were also carried out. To evaluate discriminatory validity, the PSI score of a group with depressive symptoms was compared with that of a healthy group. A similar comparison was also done for persons with anxious mood. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor construct (tension, depression, and anger) for the PSI. Reliability values were satisfactory, ranging from 0.67 to 0.87. Convergent validity was confirmed through correlation with the Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. People with depressive or anxious mood had higher scores than the healthy group on the total PSI, all three dimensions, and the short version. CONCLUSION: The long and short versions of the PSI are valid and reliable tools for measuring perceived stress. These instruments offer benefits for stress research using population-based surveys.
