Clinical Trial of SPARC Procedure in Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.
- Author:
Hoon JANG
1
;
Choong Bum LEE
;
Dae Haeng CHO
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Clinical Trial ; Original Article
- Keywords:
Urinary stress incontinence;
Surgery;
Treatment
- MeSH:
Anesthesia, General;
Catheters;
Cystitis;
Female*;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Length of Stay;
Physical Examination;
Polypropylenes;
Postoperative Complications;
Urinalysis;
Urinary Bladder;
Urinary Incontinence*;
Urinary Incontinence, Stress;
Urodynamics
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
2005;46(1):57-62
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: A suprapubic approach to the suburethral polypropylene (SPARC) procedure was reported as a new technique for urethral support in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. The safety and efficacy of the SPARC procedure were evaluated in women with stress urinary incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 50 women (mean age 48.6) with stress urinary incontinence underwent the SPARC procedure under general anesthesia between October 2002 and May 2004. The preoperative evaluations included: the patients history, a physical examination, urinalysis, an urodynamic test and incontinence staging for the Stamey grade. 2 and 5 women had previously experienced failed anti-incontinence surgery and pelvic surgery, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 8.01 months, with all patients assessed for the procedural outcome, subjective satisfaction and complications. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period, hospital stay and operation time were 8.01 months (3-15), 3.7 days (2-6) and 23 minutes (18-45), respectively. The success rate was 94%. There were no significant perioperative and postoperative complications. 3 patients (6%) had bladder perforation during the operation that necessitated an indwelling Foley catheter (mean period 7.3 days). 3 patients (6%) each had postoperative cystitis and immediate voiding difficulty that necessitated an indwelling Foley catheter (mean period 3.0 days) and bladder training, but without cutting or releasing of the tapes. 7 patients (14%) had postoperative de novo urge symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The SPARC procedure is a simple, safe and effective treatment for female stress urinary incontinence in terms of the short operation time and hospital day, and low complication and relatively high success rates. However, a longer follow-up will be necessary to determine its long term effect and efficacy.
