Comparison of Microvessel Densities (MVD) between Needle Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens in the Patients with Prostate Carcinoma.
- Author:
Byeong Kyu JEON
1
;
Duck Ki YOON
;
Jun CHEON
;
Dong Sun KIM
;
Jae Heung CHO
;
Nam Hee WON
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Hanil General Hospital, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Neovascularity;
Prostate;
Carcinoma;
Microvessel density
- MeSH:
Antibodies, Monoclonal;
Antigens, CD34;
Biological Factors;
Biopsy;
Biopsy, Needle*;
Humans;
Microvessels*;
Needles*;
Paraffin;
Population Characteristics;
Prostate*;
Prostatectomy*;
Sensitivity and Specificity
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
1999;40(11):1471-1477
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: We compared neovascularity with needle biopsies and definitive prostatectomy specimens to examine whether the measurement of microvessel density(MVD) has an ability to predict extracapsular extension with limited tissue sample. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated total 11 pathologically proven stage T3 lesions. The paraffin embedded tissues from needle biopsies and definitive prostatectomy specimens were sectioned serially. Of the serial sections obtained from prostatectomy specimens 2 showing a relatively uniform histology grade; one identical grade with biopsy sample, another the worst grade within the tumor or different grade from biopsy, and 2 from specific sites of the tumor; center and periphery, selected for examination. MVD determinations were performed immunohistochemically using monoclonal antibodies directed at the CD34 antigens. RESULTS: MVD of total 11 needle biopsies with grade 2-5 (score 4-8) ranged from 73.7 to 170.8 (median 106.7 +/- 10.6). The grade (score 5-9) distributions of prostatectomy specimens were different from those of needle biopsies and the MVD obtained from definitive prostatectomy specimens exhibited a heterogeneity within the individual tumor. The variation in densities between different grade group proved statistically different (p< 0.01, paired t-test). Also, the MVD count in the center of the tumor was higher than that in the periphery of the tumor and the difference between two group of the specific sites was statistically significant (p = 0.015, paired t-test). Finally, although MVD of biopsy sample did not correlated exclusively to that of definitive prostatectomy specimen, there would be a significant correlation of MVD between two groups if their distribution of histological grade were identical (p< 0.01, r2 = 0.889). CONCLUSIONS: Prior to surgical extirpation in the patients of clinically localized prostatic carcinomas, MVD determination of needle biopsies of the prostate would not correlate with that of definitive prostatectomy specimen. Given the limited tissue sampling from a biopsy, understanding of the site specificity of vasculature and analyzing the relationship of angiogenesis and other biologic factors of which histologic grade seems to be involved most importantly, are critical to developing a consistent and effective methodology of microvessel quantification.
