Comparison of static culture, micro-vibration culture, and micro-vibration culture with co-culture in poor ovarian responders.
10.5653/cerm.2016.43.3.146
- Author:
Yong Soo HUR
1
;
Eun Kyung RYU
;
San Hyun YOON
;
Kyung Sil LIM
;
Won Don LEE
;
Jin Ho LIM
Author Information
1. Maria Fertility Hospital, Seoul, Korea. geaher@mariababy.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Blastocyst;
Coculture techniques;
Embryo culture techniques
- MeSH:
Blastocyst;
Coculture Techniques*;
Cumulus Cells;
Embryo Culture Techniques;
Embryonic Development;
Embryonic Structures;
Female;
Humans;
Pregnancy;
Pregnancy Rate;
Zygote
- From:Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine
2016;43(3):146-151
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare the effects of static culture, dynamic culture, and the combination of dynamic culture with specialized surfaces involving co-culture on human embryonic development. Embryos cultured using conventional static culture (SC) techniques served as a control group. We compared dynamic culture using micro-vibration culture (MVC) and micro-vibration with co-culture (MCoC), in which autologous cumulus cells were used as a specialized surface. METHODS: We conducted a chart review of patients who were treated between January 2011 and November 2014 in order to compare embryonic development rates and pregnancy rates among the groups. Zygotes were cultured in micro-droplets, and embryos were subsequently selected for transfer. Some surplus embryos were cryopreserved, and the others were cultured for blastocyst development. A micro-vibrator was set at the frequency of 42 Hz for duration of 5 seconds per 60 minutes to facilitate embryo development. RESULTS: No significant differences among the groups were present in patient's characteristics. However, the clinical pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the MVC group and the MCoC group than in the SC group. No significant differences were found in the blastocyst development rate between the SC group and the MVC group, but the blastocyst development rate in the MCoC group was significantly higher than in the SC and MVC groups. CONCLUSION: The clinical pregnancy rate was significantly increased by the application of micro-vibration to the embryonic cultures of poor responders. The blastocyst development rate was significantly increased by the application of MCoC to surplus embryos.
