Consideration of Clinical Progress after Open Reduction with Retromandibular Approach in Treatment of Mandibular Condyle Fractures.
- Author:
Han Koo KIM
1
;
Nam Ho KWON
;
Tae Hui BAE
;
Woo Seob KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea. hkkiim@cau.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Mandibular condyle;
Fracture
- MeSH:
Chin;
Cicatrix, Hypertrophic;
Ear;
Facial Nerve;
Facial Paralysis;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Immobilization;
Joints;
Malocclusion;
Mandibular Condyle;
Paralysis;
Skin;
Trismus
- From:Journal of the Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
2008;9(1):17-22
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: For several decades, open reduction has been a controversial issue in mandibular condyle fracture. The authors have successfully used the open reduction and internal fixation with retromandibular approach and have found it to be satisfactory for mandibular condyle fracture. METHODS: A total of 10 patients with mandibular condyle fracture underwent open surgical treatment using retromandibular approach. The incision for the retromandibular approach was carried below the ear lobe and the facial nerve branches were identified. Dissection was continued until the fracture site was exposed and internal fixation was performed with miniplate following intermaxillary fixation. The average period of joint immobilization was 1 weeks and the arch bars were removed in 3 weeks on average. The preoperative and postoperative panoramic view and three-dimensional computed tomography were compared. During the follow up period, we evaluated the presence of malocclusion, chin deviation, trismus, pain, click sound, facial nerve palsy, hypertrophic scar and skin fistula. RESULTS: According to the radiographic findings, the fractured condyle was reducted satisfactorily in all patients without any symptoms of facial palsy. During the follow up period ranged form 6 to 12 months, all clinical symptoms were improved except in one case with chin deviation and malocclusion. CONCLUSION: Using open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condyle fracture with retromandibular approach, all results were satisfactory with good functional outcomes and minimal complication. We concluded that the open surgical treatment should be considered as the first choice for mandibular condyle fracture management.
