Usefulness of 201Tl Myocardial Perfusion SPECT in Prediction of Left Ventricular Remodeling following an Acute Myocardial Infarction.
- Author:
Seok Nam YOON
;
C H PARK
;
Kyung Hoon HWANG
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Tl-201;
Acute myocardial infarction;
Remodeling;
Revascularization
- MeSH:
Dilatation;
Dipyridamole;
Echocardiography;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Linear Models;
Multivariate Analysis;
Myocardial Infarction*;
Myocardium;
Perfusion*;
Retrospective Studies;
Stroke Volume;
Thrombolytic Therapy;
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon*;
Ventricular Remodeling*
- From:Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine
2000;34(1):30-38
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: We investigated the role of myocardial perfusion SPECT in prediction of ventricular dilatation and the role of revascularization including thrombolytic therapy and PTCA in prevention of ventricular dilatation after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed dipyridamole stress, 4 hour redistribution, and 24 hour reinjection Tl-201 SPECT in 16 patients with AMI two to nine days after attack. Perfusion and wall motion abnormalities were quantified by perfusion index (PI) and wall motion index (WMI). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), WMI and ventricular volume were measured within 1 week of AMI and after average of 6 months. According to serial changes of left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), patients were divided into two groups. We compared WMI, PI and LVEF between the two groups. Relationships among degree of volume, stress-rest PI, WMI, CKMB, Q wave, LVEF and revascularization were analysed using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Only initial rest perfusion index was significantly different between the two groups (p<0.05). While initial LVEF, stress PI, CKMB, trial of revascularization procedure, presence of Q wave and WMI were not significantly different between the two groups. Eight of 16 patients (50%) showed LV dilatation on follow-up echocardiography. Three of 3 patients (100%) who did not undergo revascualrization procedure documented LV dilatation. And only 5 (38%) of the remaining 13 patients who underwent revascularization revealed LV dilatation. There was no difference in infarct location between the two groups. By multivariate linear regression analysis in patients only undergoing revascularization, rest perfusion index was the only significant factor. CONCLUSION: Myocardial perfusion SPECT performed prior to revascularization was useful in prediction of LV dilatation after an AMI. Rest perfusion index on myocardial perfusion plays as a significant predictor of left ventricular dilatation after AMI. And revascularization appears to be a valuable procedure in alleviating LV dilatation after AMI with or without viable myocardium in a limited number of patients studied retrospectively.
