A STUDY OF CLINICAL RESULTS ON STERI-OSS ENDOSSEOUS IMPLANTS.
- Author:
Young Kyu MIN
1
;
Hyeog Sin KWEON
;
Chae Heon CHUNG
Author Information
1. Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- MeSH:
Dental Implants, Single-Tooth;
Esthetics;
Follow-Up Studies;
Gingivitis;
Humans;
Mandible;
Maxilla;
Mucous Membrane;
Osseointegration;
Prostheses and Implants;
Rehabilitation;
Survival Rate;
Tooth
- From:The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
1998;36(2):258-272
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
This investigation evaluated patients who received Steri-Oss implants from the Dental Hospital of Chosun University during the period from March 1989 to August 1997. 346 fixtures of 127 patients were included in this study . The results were as follows ; 1.The follow-up period was defined as the period between the surgical placement of the implants and the last follow-up examination. The mean follow-up period was 2.17+/-1.21 years. 2.The period between fixture installation and second surgery was 0.71+/-0.44 years in the maxilla and 0.46+/-0.21 years in the mandible. 3.The number of fixtures which were installed in the upper jaw(112) was less than that in the lower jaw(234) and in the posterior region(260) was more than in the anterior region(86). 4.The length of fixture which was most frequently used was 12 mm and least was 8mm. Screw implants were installed more than cylindrical implants. 3.8mm implant was the most common implans, followed by 4.5mm and 3.25mm. 5.The number of augmentation cases was more than that of non-augmentation cases and the rate of augmentation cases in the maxilla was more than that in the mandible. 6.Implant restorations for partial edentulos patients(94cases) were more than single-tooth implant restorations(33cases) or implant restorations for complete edentulos patients(10cases). 7.Free-standing prostheses for partially edentulous patients were more commom than any other type of connection between implants and natural teeth. 8.Plaque Index(0.95+/-0.74) and Gingival Index(0.31+/-0.52) were very similar around the natural teeth and reflected an acceptable level of plaque and gingivitis control. Mean value for keratinized mucosa index(1.93+/-1.20) remained fairly constant around level 2(1-2 mm keratinized epithelium). 9.Patients were generally satisfied with implant in terms of comfort, function, speech and esthetics. 10.There was not a statistically significant differences in overall survial rate between implants placed in the maxilla (91.5%) and those placed in the mandible (93.8%). Fourteen implants lost before the prosthetic rehabilitation and eleven implants lost following variable periods in function after the prosthetic phase of the treatment. 11.Cause of implant failures was exfoliation or removal of fixture due to non-osseointegration before the prosthetic rehabilitation or due to fracture of fixture, masticatory pain after the prosthetic rehabilitation. 12.The survival rate of Steri-Oss implants using the Kaplan-Meier statistical analysis was 93.8% at 2 year and 86.6% at 5 year. In all cases, implant losses occured predominantly in the healing period. There was a steep decline in the rate of implant loss after the first year. 13.The survival rate of Steri-Oss implants in the anterior region was 94.8% at 2 year and 94.8% at 5 year and that in the posterior region was 92.8% at 2 year and 75.9% at 5 year. In conclusion, this study revealed a number of parameters and guidelines for achieving an optimal success rate in osseointegration.
